Circuit Court of Appeals allowed the claims to proceed to trial, saying that a jury could find The U
For more than a decade, Merck has been defending itself against claims its osteoporosis drug Fosamax caused patients to suffer “atypical femoral fractures (Reuters) - Following a trip to the U
Ending a 14-Year Battle, Merck Wins Dismissal of Suits Linking Fosamax to Fractured Femurs
NPR's Ailsa Chang talks with Mary Ziegler, UC Davis law professor, about the Alabama Supreme Court ruling that says frozen embryos are people and
S
In a statement, the anti-abortion group Live Action said it hoped the Alabama
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U
The ruling in In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, Case No
S
Supreme Court on Monday gave Merck & Co a new opportunity to avoid lawsuits accusing the company of failing to properly warn patients of debilitating thigh-bone fractures from taking its osteoporosis drug Fosamax, throwing out a lower court decision that had revived the litigation
Stay Tuned For More Updates Every month there are new developments in
17-290 – which is the Supreme Court docket name for the defendant’s appeal from the horrible preemption decision (our worst case of the year for 2017) in In re
The Supreme Court has allowed a court order to take effect that could loosen Apple’s grip on its lucrative iPhone app store, and potentially affect billions of dollars in revenue a year
The U
’s appeal in the years-long Fosamax liability litigation, acting Solicitor General Jefferey Wall asked for permission to Law360, New York (July 2, 2013, 8:14 PM EDT) -- A New Jersey federal judge's ruling Thursday that claims related to Merck & Co
Levine framework – rather, it seems likely that the Supreme Court will issue a
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has in turn remanded the case to the district court to determine whether state law claims are preempted by federal law in the 500+ lawsuits pending regarding the medication Fosamax in Merck Sharpe & Dohme v
Supreme Court ruling Monday, Merck gets yet another chance to press its case
3d 268 (3d Cir
Opinion by Joseph Ellis • 9m